Vers l’effondrement de l’Arabie saoudite

Blida Eveil

FRELONMON GRAIN DE SEL :

Mais c’est un sacré nid de Frelon/Félon que nous avons là. Mais Al saoud/yahoud, en tant qu’abruti primaire en chef frelon, vient d’allumer le baril de poudre placer sous son trône.

Bon débarras.

Publié par  :  KAM

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

Vers l’effondrement de l’Arabie saoudite

Publié par wikistrike.com sur 12 Janvier 2016, 08:42am

Le prince Mohammed ben Salmane Al Saoud, 30 ans, prince héritier suppléant, second Premier ministre suppléant, ministre d’État, ministre de la Défense, secrétaire général de la Cour royale, président du Conseil pour les Affaires économiques et le Développement.

Le prince Mohammed ben Salmane Al Saoud, 30 ans, prince héritier suppléant, second Premier ministre suppléant, ministre d’État, ministre de la Défense, secrétaire général de la Cour royale, président du Conseil pour les Affaires économiques et le Développement.

Alors que les Saoud jouissent des derniers moments de leur dictature, la décapitation du chef de son opposition, Nimr al-Nimr, prive la moitié de la population saoudienne de tout espoir. Pour Thierry Meyssan, la chute du royaume est devenue inévitable. Elle devrait s’accompagner d’une longue période d’extrême violence.

En un an, le nouveau roi d’Arabie, Salmane…

View original post 1,163 more words

Les dix stratégies de manipulation de masses

1- La stratégie de la distraction

Élément primordial du contrôle social, la stratégie de la diversion consiste à détourner l’attention du public des problèmes importants et des mutations décidées par les élites politiques et économiques, grâce à un déluge continuel de distractions et d’informations insignifiantes. La stratégie de la diversion est également indispensable pour empêcher le public de s’intéresser aux connaissances essentielles, dans les domaines de la science, de l’économie, de la psychologie, de la neurobiologie, et de la cybernétique. « Garder l’attention du public distraite, loin des véritables problèmes sociaux, captivée par des sujets sans importance réelle. Garder le public occupé, occupé, occupé, sans aucun temps pour penser; de retour à la ferme avec les autres animaux. » Extrait de « Armes silencieuses pour guerres tranquilles »

.

2- Problèmes, réaction, solution

Cette méthode est aussi appelée « problème-réaction-solution ». On crée d’abord un problème, une « situation » prévue pour susciter une certaine réaction du public, afin que celui-ci soit lui-même demandeur des mesures qu’on souhaite lui faire accepter. Par exemple: laisser se développer la violence urbaine, ou organiser des attentats sanglants, afin que le public soit demandeur de lois sécuritaires au détriment de la liberté. Ou encore : créer une crise économique pour faire accepter comme un mal nécessaire le recul des droits sociaux et le démantèlement des services publics.

.

3- La stratégie de la dégradation

Pour faire accepter une mesure inacceptable, il suffit de l’appliquer progressivement, en « dégradé », sur une durée de 10 ans. C’est de cette façon que des conditions socio-économiques radicalement nouvelles (néolibéralisme) ont été imposées durant les années 1980 à 1990. Chômage massif, précarité, flexibilité, délocalisations, salaires n’assurant plus un revenu décent, autant de changements qui auraient provoqué une révolution s’ils avaient été appliqués brutalement.

4- La stratégie du différé

Une autre façon de faire accepter une décision impopulaire est de la présenter comme « douloureuse mais nécessaire », en obtenant l’accord du public dans le présent pour une application dans le futur. Il est toujours plus facile d’accepter un sacrifice futur qu’un sacrifice immédiat. D’abord parce que l’effort n’est pas à fournir tout de suite. Ensuite parce que le public a toujours tendance à espérer naïvement que « tout ira mieux demain » et que le sacrifice demandé pourra être évité. Enfin, cela laisse du temps au public pour s’habituer à l’idée du changement et l’accepter avec résignation lorsque le moment sera venu.

.

5- S’adresser au public comme à des enfants en bas-âge

La plupart des publicités destinées au grand-public utilisent un discours, des arguments, des personnages, et un ton particulièrement infantilisant, souvent proche du débilitant, comme si le spectateur était un enfant en bas-âge ou un handicapé mental. Plus on cherchera à tromper le spectateur, plus on adoptera un ton infantilisant. Pourquoi ? « Si on s’adresse à une personne comme si elle était âgée de 12 ans, alors, en raison de la suggestibilité, elle aura, avec une certaine probabilité, une réponse ou une réaction aussi dénuée de sens critique que celles d’une personne de 12 ans ». Extrait de « Armes silencieuses pour guerres tranquilles »

.6- Faire appel à l’émotionnel plutôt qu’à la réflexion

Faire appel à l’émotionnel est une technique classique pour court-circuiter l’analyse rationnelle, et donc le sens critique des individus. De plus, l’utilisation du registre émotionnel permet d’ouvrir la porte d’accès à l’inconscient (Subconscient) pour y implanter des idées, des désirs, des peurs, des pulsions, ou des comportements voire une réalité spécieuse

.7- Maintenir le public dans l’ignorance et la bêtise

Faire en sorte que le public soit incapable de comprendre les technologies et les méthodes utilisées pour son contrôle et son esclavage. « La qualité de l’éducation donnée aux classes inférieures doit être la plus pauvre, de telle sorte que le fossé de l’ignorance qui isole les classes inférieures des classes supérieures soit et demeure incompréhensible par les classes inférieures. Extrait de « Armes silencieuses pour guerres tranquilles »

8- Encourager le public à se complaire dans la médiocrité

Encourager le public à trouver « cool » le fait d’être bête, vulgaire, et inculte…

.

9- Remplacer la révolte par la culpabilité

Faire croire à l’individu qu’il est seul responsable de son malheur, à cause de l’insuffisance de son intelligence, de ses capacités, ou de ses efforts. Ainsi, au lieu de se révolter contre le système économique, l’individu s’auto-dévalue et culpabilise, ce qui engendre un état dépressif dont l’un des effets est l’inhibition de l’action. Et sans action, pas de révolution!…

.

10- Connaitre les individus mieux qu’ils ne se connaissent eux-mêmes

Au cours des 50 dernières années, les progrès fulgurants de la science ont creusé un fossé croissant entre les connaissances du public et celles détenues et utilisées par les élites dirigeantes. Grâce à la biologie, la neurobiologie, et la psychologie appliquée, le « système » est parvenu à une connaissance avancée de l’être humain, à la fois physiquement et psychologiquement. Le système en est arrivé à mieux connaitre l’individu moyen que celui-ci ne se connait lui-même. Cela signifie que dans la majorité des cas, le système détient un plus grand contrôle et un plus grand pouvoir sur les individus que les individus eux-mêmes.

One To Ten Mass Manipulation Strategies

1 / Distraction strategy

Key element of social control, the strategy of diversion is to divert public’s attention away from important issues and changes decided by the political and economic elites, through a continual flood of distractions and trivial information. The strategy of distraction is also essential to prevent the public to focus on the essential knowledge in the fields of science, economics, psychology, neurobiology, and cybernetics. “Keep distracting the public attention away from real social problems, its attention is captivated by matters of no real importance. Keep the public busy, busy, busy, no time to think; back on the farm with the other animals. “Excerpt from” Silent Weapons for Quiet Wars “

2 / Create problems, then offer solutions (PRS)

This method is also called “problemreaction-solution.” We first create a problem, a “situation” that triggers a certain reaction of the public, so then the latter will be asking for measures that we wish to impose on him. For example: let’s  start an urban violence, or arrange for bloody attacks, so that the public will be asking for a drastic  security laws,to the detriment of freedom. Or: create an economic crisis to accept as a necessary sacrifice, the decline of social rights and the dismantling of public services.

3 / strategy degradation
To make them accept the unacceptable , just apply it gradually, “degraded” over a period of 10 years. This is the way that new socio-economic conditions radically  (neoliberal) were imposed in the years 1980 to 1990. Massive unemployment, precariousness, flexibility, outsourcing, wages no longer ensure a decent income, so many changes that would have caused a revolution if they had been applied suddenly.

4 / deferral strategy

Another way to accept an unpopular decision is to present it as “painful but necessary”, obtaining the agreement of the public to be introduced in the near future. It is always easier to accept a future sacrifice that an immediate sacrifice. First, because the effort is not to be provided immediately. Then because the public still tends to naively hope that “everything will be better tomorrow” and that the sacrifice required may be avoided. Finally, it allows time for the public to get used to the idea of change and accept it with resignation when the time comes.

5 / Addressing the public as to children in a nursery

Most advertisements for the general public use a discourse, arguments, characters, and in a particularly infantilizing tone, often close to the dumb down, as if the viewer was a child or suffers from a mental disability. The more we seek to deceive the viewer, the more we adopt a condescending tone. Why? “it is for a person who is 12 years old or less, then, due to suggestibility, it will, with some probability, respond with an uncritical reaction of  a 12 year old child. “Excerpted from “Silent Weapons for Quiet Wars”

6 / Appealing to the emotional rather than thinking

Appealing to the emotional is a classic technique for bypassing rational analysis, and thus the critical sense of individuals. In addition, the use of emotional register opens the gateway to the unconscious to implant ideas, desires, fears, impulses, or behavior

7 / Keep the public in ignorance and stupidity

Ensure that the public is incapable of understanding the technologies and methods used for its control and slavery. “The quality of education given to the lower classes must be the poor, so that the moat of ignorance isolating the inferior ranks of the upper classes is and remains incomprehensible to the lower classes. Excerpt from Silent Weapons for Quiet Wars”

8 / Encourage the public to wallow in mediocrity

Encourage the public to find “cool” being stupid, vulgar and uneducated

 9 / Replace the revolt by guilt

To believe that the individual is solely responsible for his misfortune, because of the inadequacy of his intellect, abilities, or their efforts. So, instead of rebelling against the economic system, the individual and self-devaluing guilt, which creates a depression, one of whose effects is the inhibition of the action. And without action, no revolution!

10 / Know the people better than they know themselvesOver the last 50 years, dramatic advances in science have dug a growing gap between public knowledge and those owned and used by the ruling elites. Thanks to biology, neurobiology and applied psychology, the “system” has reached an advanced knowledge of the human being, both physically and psychologically. The system has come to know the individual means that he will know himself. This means that in most cases, the system has more control and more power over individuals that individuals themselves.

A Man who tells the truth should be locked up

In this society of today we tend to allow the freedom of speech when it suits a certain category of people, for instance if we criticise Islam Muslims Arabs blacks, and others it’s allowed under the pretext of freedom of speech but the same won’t apply if we ought to criticise the fascist regime of Israel.

Under the flag of anti-Semitism they will pull for the slightest criticism of Jews or Israel particularly Israel, the irony to this is that they even accuse Arabs and others of the Semitic origins of being anti-Semitic.

The truth is, they are not even of a Semitic origin themselves, so anyone who dares to speak out against the atrocities committed on a daily basis by the fascist racist state of Israel is quickly been silenced by the ADL or JDL.

This article describes most of the points and clarifies the ambiguity that is surrounding the Jewish myth and the Jewish state “Israel”

THE CRUEL HOAX

We have the strongest evidence, then, from historic and linguistic sources, that the Ashkenazi-Khazarian population of Eastern Europe, (the source of most of the people that call themselves “Jews” but are not), if not 100 percent Gentile before the mid-17th Century, were very near to it.

For a very long time now, the elders of this group of so-called “Jews” have been telling the children to marry into the gentile people in order to soften or delete the facial features; this has been happening for a very long time in order to “infiltrate” the gentile without much notice of what they really are – controlling Khazars at heart.

With this in mind, the Jewish claim that all of Eastern Europe contains at least some of the blood of Abraham becomes spurious; the crudest attempt to preserve the Askenazim from being as “Gentile” as the verdict of history decrees them to be. Rejecting history, Khazar-Jewish scholars scramble for even the smallest claim to the patrimony of Abraham, since it is essential not only to the “self-esteem” of Eastern European “Jewry,” but to legitimize the present Jewish claim to Palestine – a claim which has been most insistently made by those of Khazar origin.

The most any Eastern European “Jew” can claim with confidence is that his forefathers were converted to Judaism out of Paganism. The story of the Khazar Empire, as it slowly emerges from the past, begins to look like the most cruel hoax which history has ever perpetrated.

Yet if this black joke is on the Jews, it is almost as much on American fundamentalists. Most Jewish settlers in Palestine during the first half of this century were Ashkenazim. Yet Christians have defended them as “God’s chosen people” hogwash, whose zeal in expropriating the native Palestinians they viewed as the laudable predestined role of regaining the land promised to their fore fathers.


The truth is, the majority of these Jews who pioneered Palestine, high-handedly expelling Arabs from their homes were no more the descendants of Abraham.
While Christians have totally accepted the racial and territorial claims of the Ashkenazim, it is intriguing that most of their fellow Israelites, the Sephardic, and Oriental Jews, have not.

In modern Israel there is a racial memory which persists a primal resentment of those aggressive, red-haired Jews from the north. In fact, antipathy between Ashkenazi and Sephardic-Oriental is so intense that it is an exception if they intermarry; racial slurs, discrimination, and even violence between them is increasingly common. Nevertheless, both Jews and U.S. Evangelicals are reluctant to accept the historic, racial basis from such aversion, preferring to believe all Jews are, by definition, the children of Abraham.

What is the spiritual and prophetic significance of the inbreeding of the Khazars into the stem of Judah? Does it threaten the Biblical promise of God’s ultimate restoration of the Jewish nation?

Consider, for example, the Sephardic Jew the Jew most likely to inherit the actual genes of Abraham. Although we would like to believe he is untainted by Gentile admixture, again, the evidence suggests otherwise.

Why is it that Jews living in Holland, Morocco, Italy or Turkey often resemble the inhabitants of their host country more than Jews living in other parts of the world?

It is because, despite Rabbinic scriptures, Jews have intermarried with their host nations during the dispersion, just as they did in biblical times. During the past two thousand years, the beautiful daughters of Rebekah have been seduced or wooed by Gentile men. Jewish boys covet fair-haired, blue-eyed gentile girls. Today in America 40 percent of Jewish young men marry outside their race.

Is this only a recent phenomena? Of course not.

 Intermarriage of such magnitude is indeed not unique to our time, but not the fact of intermarriage in Israel an indulgence by peasant or potentate from the beginning.

THE ZIONIST EXPLANATION


Just as there arc two different parts of Christianity, Catholic and Protestant, which have fought bitterly during the history of the world, there are likewise two parts of what is known as Judaism, the Orthodox Jewish Religion, and the Zionist Judaism by the Politics of Race.

The Zionist Judaism today is not only made up of Kharzars/Jews but you will also find so-called Christians supporting their cause. Our government, Senate, House of Representative and Presidency is almost 100% Zionist/Kharzar. controlled that is why we are having some outrageous Zionist slanted laws pasted by these people that we have put in power with our vote of trust, so they could stab us in the back.

This is how some people such as former President Wilson and the Rev. Jerry Falwell could claim to be both Zionists and Christians.

That sounds like a warped mine or double jeopardy.

source: http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/sociopolitica/esp_sociopol_zion34.htm

So Muhammad was a Paedophile ?

This article is in response to some slanderers who specialise in lies and fabrication and pretend to be Christians but we know they are not, it’s a disguise be aware of those calling themselves Christians and all they do is bash and tarnish Islam anyway they can.

Let’s examine their behaviour, first they come at you with nothing but allegations never produce any shred of evidence,

For instance, when it was put in front of their noses that the Prophet (PBUH) was never a paedophile which we will discuss later in this article, they call us “Apologists ” ironically when anyone says that Joseph (PBUH) married Mary the mother of Jesus was 90 and she was only 12, they quickly claim it’s not authentic.

Now we will find out if the evidence that clearly shows that Aisha (Raa) was never 9 and note they still didn’t refute this piece of evidence, they just don’t want to accept it therefore it is sufficient to disregard it (Funny)

Now, we won’t be talking she said he said we will talk maths:

When Asma (raa) died she was 100 years old right or wrong can you deny this fact ?

She was 100, if we deduct 73 AH (Islamic calendar) that makes 100 – 73 = it leaves us what ? 27 ?

If she was 10 years older than her sister, how old was Aisha ? 17 right ? (SIMPLE MATHS)

Now a year later they consummated their marriage which makes 17 + 1 = 18 right ?

Now to you out there who are writing pages up on pages of load of rubbish come here and prove to us this is wrong with few sentences you don’t need pages. (Don’t try to drown the fish)

Try and refute this piece of evidence.

 Evidence when the Chapter of the Moon was revealed here it is what Aysha (raa) said:

”I was a young girl playing when the verse of Allaah (which means): {Nay, but the Hour is their appointed time (for their full recompense), and the Hour will be more grievous and more bitter.} [Quran, 54:46], was revealed.”

—–

Chapter Al-Qamar [Quran, 54], was revealed seven years before the battle of Badr, as Ibn ‘Abbaas

610 CE: First revelation

610 CE: AbuBakr accepts Islam

613 CE: Prophet Muhammad begins preaching publicly.

615 CE: Emigration to Abyssinia

616 CE: Umar bin al Khattab accepts Islam

620 CE: Generally accepted betrothal of Ayesha to the Prophet

622 CE: Hijrah (emigation to Yathrib, later renamed Medina)

623/624 CE: Generally accepted year of Ayesha living with the Prophet

2) Evidence

However, in another work, Al-Tabari says: “All four of his [Abu Bakr’s] children were born of histwo wives during the pre-Islamic period” (Tarikhu’l-umam wa’l-mamlu’k, Al-Tabari (died 922), Vol. 2, p. 616, Arabic, Mausasth Ilmi, Beirut, 1979).

If Ayesha was betrothed in 620 CE (at the age of seven) and started to live with the Prophet in 624CE (at the age of nine), that would indicate that she was born in 613 CE and was nine when she began living with the Prophet. Therefore, based on one account of Al-Tabari, the numbers show that Ayesha must have been born in 613 CE, three years after the beginning of revelation (610 CE).

Tabari also states that Ayesha was born in the pre-Islamic era (in Jahiliya). If she was born before 610 CE, she would have been at least 14 years old when she began living with the Prophet. Essentially, Tabari contradicts himself.

EVIDENCE #3 : Ayesha’s Age in relation to Asma’s Age

According to Abda’l-Rahman ibn abi zanna’d: “Asma was 10 years older than Ayesha (Siyar A’la’ma’l-nubala’, Al-Zahabi, Vol. 2, p. 289, Arabic, Mu’assasatu’l-risalah, Beirut, 1992).

According to Ibn Kathir: “She [Asma] was elder to her sister [Ayesha] by 10 years” (Al-Bidayah wa’lnihayah,Ibn Kathir, Vol. 8, p. 371, Dar al-fikr al-‘arabi, Al-jizah, 1933).

According to Ibn Kathir: “She [Asma] saw the killing of her son during that year [73 AH], as we have already mentioned, and five days later she herself died. According to other narratives, she died not after five days but 10 or 20, or a few days over 20, or 100 days later. The most well known narrative is that of 100 days later. At the time of her death, she was 100 years old.” (Al-Bidayah

wa’l-nihayah, Ibn Kathir, Vol. 8, p. 372, Dar al-fikr al-‘arabi, Al-jizah, 1933); Ibne Asakir vol 69 Page18; Alsunnan Alkubra Albehaqi Vol6 Page204

According to Ibn Hajar Al-Asqalani: “She [Asma] lived a hundred years and died in 73 or 74 AH.”(Taqribu’l-tehzib, Ibn Hajar Al-Asqalani, p. 654, Arabic, Bab fi’l-nisa’, al-harfu’l-alif, Lucknow).

According to almost all the historians, Asma, the elder sister of Ayesha was 10 years older than Ayesha. If Asma was 100 years old in 73 AH, she should have been 27 or 28 years old at the time of the hijrah.

If Asma was 27 or 28 years old at the time of hijrah, Ayesha should have been 17 or 18 years old. Thus, Ayesha, being 17 or 18 years of at the time of Hijra, she started to cohabit with the Prophet between at either 19 to 20 years of age.

Surat El Qamar (The moon) was revealed in 614 CE

EVIDENCE #4: Chapter (54) Surat al-Qamar (The Moon)

According to the generally accepted tradition, Ayesha was born about eight years before hijrah. But according to another narrative in Bukhari, Ayesha is reported to have said: “I was a young girl (jariyah in Arabic)” when Chapter 54 (Surah) Al-Qamar was revealed (Sahih Bukhari, kitabu’l-tafsir, Bab Qaulihi Bab al-sa’atu Maw’iduhum wa’l-sa’atu adha’ wa amarr).

Chapter 54 of the Quran was revealed eight years before hijrah (The Bounteous Koran, M.M. Khatib, 1985), indicating that it was revealed in 614 CE. If Ayesha started living with the Prophet at the age of nine in 623 CE or 624 CE, she was a newborn infant (sibyah in Arabic) at the time that Surah Al- Qamar (The Moon) was revealed. According to the above tradition, Ayesha was actually a young

girl, not an infant in the year of revelation of Al-Qamar. Jariyah means young playful girl (Lane’s Arabic English Lexicon). So, Ayesha, being a jariyah not a sabiyah (infant), must be somewhere between 6-13 years old at the time of revelation of Al-Qamar, and therefore must have been 14-21 years at the time she married the Prophet.

And finally : This tradition also contradicts the marriage of Ayesha at the age of 9

Now unless someone can refute all of the evidence mentioned above he she is welcome to do so, otherwise please refrain from attacking Islam and the Prophet of Islam with fabricated lies.

Your arguments don’t stand up you can twist them all you want, truth speaks for itself.

Oh by the way we are not apologists we are stating facts but of course when you don’t like the truth that blows away you fabricated lies you call us apologists it’s ironic and even funny when someone accuses Joseph (pbuh) to be a Paedophile because he married Mary (pbuh) when he was 90 and she was 12, you quickly deny that it is an authentic piece of history you quickly try and disregard it, but when we show you that in some hadeeths there are even contradictions, you still refuse to accept it, typical, because you’re in no way seeking the truth, that means all your effort gone with the wind, it’s a blow that is hard to take on the chin, and always undercover as “Christians” a true Christian would never lie slander, fabricate.and he would show respect to others.

So we know who you are, so drop the act

Try and refute the above evidence and then we can have a more civilised discussion.

Peace to those who wants peace, regardless of their belief creed or colour.

La Grande Vadrouille 1966

L’un des plus beaux films Français qui a connu un grand succès, c’est à propos de trois parachutistes Anglais de la (RAF) Royal air Force. qui revenaient d’une mission d’allemagne en survolant la France puis leur bombardier a été abattu au dessus de Paris,  aidé par deux Français dont un est le chef d’orchestre de l’opéra de paris   Mr Lefort et l’autre un peintre décorateur Mr Augustin.

Mon analyse n’est pas basée sur le thème du film mais plutôt sur certains sous entendus et messages subliminaux  tout le long du film.

Durant ce film, on voit que Mr Lefort et Augustin (Louis de Funes et André Bourvil) se croisent à la mosquée de paris aux bains turcs pour retrouver chacun (Big) Moustache puis rassembler les 3 parachutistes de la royale air force et pour les aider a quitter paris.

Mais le code est une chanson connue sous le titre “Tea for Two” un thé pour deux.

Donc durant leur retrouvaille ils sifflotent chacun cette mélodie tournant autour d’un gros moustachu mais en faisant des gestes “Homosexuel” Puis quand ils se croisent l’un dit a l’autre “Are you ? L’autre répond You are ?”

Donc le sous entendu ici est que “Êtes vous ?”  On comprend êtes vous homosexuel ?

ET aussi êtes vous de la confrérie  franc maçons ?

Donc la on a deux sous entendus un c’est bien sur prendre ça comme deux hommes qui cherchent un partenaire, mais le second sous entendu est un surtout le signe des Francs Maçons.

Puis notez bien quand ils se serrent la main c’est vraiment d’une façon très subtile dont les francs maçons se serrent la main comme un code entre eux pour qu’ils puissent se reconnaître.

Et l’autre partie du film est pendant qu’ils tentaient de quitter l’opéra il y avait un personnage habillé tout en rouge comme le diable qui essayait de les aider à s’échapper et il leur dit: Dieu  vous garde

Et le seul panneau sous terrain qu’ils ont montré portait le nom “La vieille du temple”

Puis quand les 2 anglais se retrouvaient dans un couvent ou la mère supérieure lui disait de dire trente trois, trente trois, lui a répondu thirty three, thirty three.

Autre chose est que plusieurs références ont été faites au sujet de la grosse moustache et qu’il devait la raser etc..

Voila donc un film d’apparence innocente mais toujours des petites indications francs maçonnique dans pratiquement chaque film.

Sauf qu’on ne fait jamais attention a ces petits détails, mais entre eux ils arrivent a se reconnaître et manifester leur pouvoir de cette manière.

Il se pourrait que même les acteurs ne savent pas, ils suivent le scenario, le dialogue qui leur a été présenté, ils appliquent sans même savoir a quoi ils contribuent, possible que le directeur s’assure que tout est inclus dans le film et qu’aucun détail n’est laissé au hasard.

Parce que nous sommes très souvent distraits avec l’histoire du film, avec la musique, avec le paysage ou le rire et parce que on est totalement impliqués dans le film, on sombres dans l’ inconscient une sorte de transe, et par conséquent  on ne fait pas très attention aux  petits détails, cependant notre subconscient enregistre le tout et c’est ainsi que les masses sont éduquées et elles sont ramenées à accepter beaucoup de choses.