So Muhammad was a Paedophile ?

This article is in response to some slanderers who specialise in lies and fabrication and pretend to be Christians but we know they are not, it’s a disguise be aware of those calling themselves Christians and all they do is bash and tarnish Islam anyway they can.

Let’s examine their behaviour, first they come at you with nothing but allegations never produce any shred of evidence,

For instance, when it was put in front of their noses that the Prophet (PBUH) was never a paedophile which we will discuss later in this article, they call us “Apologists ” ironically when anyone says that Joseph (PBUH) married Mary the mother of Jesus was 90 and she was only 12, they quickly claim it’s not authentic.

Now we will find out if the evidence that clearly shows that Aisha (Raa) was never 9 and note they still didn’t refute this piece of evidence, they just don’t want to accept it therefore it is sufficient to disregard it (Funny)

Now, we won’t be talking she said he said we will talk maths:

When Asma (raa) died she was 100 years old right or wrong can you deny this fact ?

She was 100, if we deduct 73 AH (Islamic calendar) that makes 100 – 73 = it leaves us what ? 27 ?

If she was 10 years older than her sister, how old was Aisha ? 17 right ? (SIMPLE MATHS)

Now a year later they consummated their marriage which makes 17 + 1 = 18 right ?

Now to you out there who are writing pages up on pages of load of rubbish come here and prove to us this is wrong with few sentences you don’t need pages. (Don’t try to drown the fish)

Try and refute this piece of evidence.

 Evidence when the Chapter of the Moon was revealed here it is what Aysha (raa) said:

”I was a young girl playing when the verse of Allaah (which means): {Nay, but the Hour is their appointed time (for their full recompense), and the Hour will be more grievous and more bitter.} [Quran, 54:46], was revealed.”

—–

Chapter Al-Qamar [Quran, 54], was revealed seven years before the battle of Badr, as Ibn ‘Abbaas

610 CE: First revelation

610 CE: AbuBakr accepts Islam

613 CE: Prophet Muhammad begins preaching publicly.

615 CE: Emigration to Abyssinia

616 CE: Umar bin al Khattab accepts Islam

620 CE: Generally accepted betrothal of Ayesha to the Prophet

622 CE: Hijrah (emigation to Yathrib, later renamed Medina)

623/624 CE: Generally accepted year of Ayesha living with the Prophet

2) Evidence

However, in another work, Al-Tabari says: “All four of his [Abu Bakr’s] children were born of histwo wives during the pre-Islamic period” (Tarikhu’l-umam wa’l-mamlu’k, Al-Tabari (died 922), Vol. 2, p. 616, Arabic, Mausasth Ilmi, Beirut, 1979).

If Ayesha was betrothed in 620 CE (at the age of seven) and started to live with the Prophet in 624CE (at the age of nine), that would indicate that she was born in 613 CE and was nine when she began living with the Prophet. Therefore, based on one account of Al-Tabari, the numbers show that Ayesha must have been born in 613 CE, three years after the beginning of revelation (610 CE).

Tabari also states that Ayesha was born in the pre-Islamic era (in Jahiliya). If she was born before 610 CE, she would have been at least 14 years old when she began living with the Prophet. Essentially, Tabari contradicts himself.

EVIDENCE #3 : Ayesha’s Age in relation to Asma’s Age

According to Abda’l-Rahman ibn abi zanna’d: “Asma was 10 years older than Ayesha (Siyar A’la’ma’l-nubala’, Al-Zahabi, Vol. 2, p. 289, Arabic, Mu’assasatu’l-risalah, Beirut, 1992).

According to Ibn Kathir: “She [Asma] was elder to her sister [Ayesha] by 10 years” (Al-Bidayah wa’lnihayah,Ibn Kathir, Vol. 8, p. 371, Dar al-fikr al-‘arabi, Al-jizah, 1933).

According to Ibn Kathir: “She [Asma] saw the killing of her son during that year [73 AH], as we have already mentioned, and five days later she herself died. According to other narratives, she died not after five days but 10 or 20, or a few days over 20, or 100 days later. The most well known narrative is that of 100 days later. At the time of her death, she was 100 years old.” (Al-Bidayah

wa’l-nihayah, Ibn Kathir, Vol. 8, p. 372, Dar al-fikr al-‘arabi, Al-jizah, 1933); Ibne Asakir vol 69 Page18; Alsunnan Alkubra Albehaqi Vol6 Page204

According to Ibn Hajar Al-Asqalani: “She [Asma] lived a hundred years and died in 73 or 74 AH.”(Taqribu’l-tehzib, Ibn Hajar Al-Asqalani, p. 654, Arabic, Bab fi’l-nisa’, al-harfu’l-alif, Lucknow).

According to almost all the historians, Asma, the elder sister of Ayesha was 10 years older than Ayesha. If Asma was 100 years old in 73 AH, she should have been 27 or 28 years old at the time of the hijrah.

If Asma was 27 or 28 years old at the time of hijrah, Ayesha should have been 17 or 18 years old. Thus, Ayesha, being 17 or 18 years of at the time of Hijra, she started to cohabit with the Prophet between at either 19 to 20 years of age.

Surat El Qamar (The moon) was revealed in 614 CE

EVIDENCE #4: Chapter (54) Surat al-Qamar (The Moon)

According to the generally accepted tradition, Ayesha was born about eight years before hijrah. But according to another narrative in Bukhari, Ayesha is reported to have said: “I was a young girl (jariyah in Arabic)” when Chapter 54 (Surah) Al-Qamar was revealed (Sahih Bukhari, kitabu’l-tafsir, Bab Qaulihi Bab al-sa’atu Maw’iduhum wa’l-sa’atu adha’ wa amarr).

Chapter 54 of the Quran was revealed eight years before hijrah (The Bounteous Koran, M.M. Khatib, 1985), indicating that it was revealed in 614 CE. If Ayesha started living with the Prophet at the age of nine in 623 CE or 624 CE, she was a newborn infant (sibyah in Arabic) at the time that Surah Al- Qamar (The Moon) was revealed. According to the above tradition, Ayesha was actually a young

girl, not an infant in the year of revelation of Al-Qamar. Jariyah means young playful girl (Lane’s Arabic English Lexicon). So, Ayesha, being a jariyah not a sabiyah (infant), must be somewhere between 6-13 years old at the time of revelation of Al-Qamar, and therefore must have been 14-21 years at the time she married the Prophet.

And finally : This tradition also contradicts the marriage of Ayesha at the age of 9

Now unless someone can refute all of the evidence mentioned above he she is welcome to do so, otherwise please refrain from attacking Islam and the Prophet of Islam with fabricated lies.

Your arguments don’t stand up you can twist them all you want, truth speaks for itself.

Oh by the way we are not apologists we are stating facts but of course when you don’t like the truth that blows away you fabricated lies you call us apologists it’s ironic and even funny when someone accuses Joseph (pbuh) to be a Paedophile because he married Mary (pbuh) when he was 90 and she was 12, you quickly deny that it is an authentic piece of history you quickly try and disregard it, but when we show you that in some hadeeths there are even contradictions, you still refuse to accept it, typical, because you’re in no way seeking the truth, that means all your effort gone with the wind, it’s a blow that is hard to take on the chin, and always undercover as “Christians” a true Christian would never lie slander, fabricate.and he would show respect to others.

So we know who you are, so drop the act

Try and refute the above evidence and then we can have a more civilised discussion.

Peace to those who wants peace, regardless of their belief creed or colour.

La Grande Vadrouille 1966

L’un des plus beaux films Français qui a connu un grand succès, c’est à propos de trois parachutistes Anglais de la (RAF) Royal air Force. qui revenaient d’une mission d’allemagne en survolant la France puis leur bombardier a été abattu au dessus de Paris,  aidé par deux Français dont un est le chef d’orchestre de l’opéra de paris   Mr Lefort et l’autre un peintre décorateur Mr Augustin.

Mon analyse n’est pas basée sur le thème du film mais plutôt sur certains sous entendus et messages subliminaux  tout le long du film.

Durant ce film, on voit que Mr Lefort et Augustin (Louis de Funes et André Bourvil) se croisent à la mosquée de paris aux bains turcs pour retrouver chacun (Big) Moustache puis rassembler les 3 parachutistes de la royale air force et pour les aider a quitter paris.

Mais le code est une chanson connue sous le titre “Tea for Two” un thé pour deux.

Donc durant leur retrouvaille ils sifflotent chacun cette mélodie tournant autour d’un gros moustachu mais en faisant des gestes “Homosexuel” Puis quand ils se croisent l’un dit a l’autre “Are you ? L’autre répond You are ?”

Donc le sous entendu ici est que “Êtes vous ?”  On comprend êtes vous homosexuel ?

ET aussi êtes vous de la confrérie  franc maçons ?

Donc la on a deux sous entendus un c’est bien sur prendre ça comme deux hommes qui cherchent un partenaire, mais le second sous entendu est un surtout le signe des Francs Maçons.

Puis notez bien quand ils se serrent la main c’est vraiment d’une façon très subtile dont les francs maçons se serrent la main comme un code entre eux pour qu’ils puissent se reconnaître.

Et l’autre partie du film est pendant qu’ils tentaient de quitter l’opéra il y avait un personnage habillé tout en rouge comme le diable qui essayait de les aider à s’échapper et il leur dit: Dieu  vous garde

Et le seul panneau sous terrain qu’ils ont montré portait le nom “La vieille du temple”

Puis quand les 2 anglais se retrouvaient dans un couvent ou la mère supérieure lui disait de dire trente trois, trente trois, lui a répondu thirty three, thirty three.

Autre chose est que plusieurs références ont été faites au sujet de la grosse moustache et qu’il devait la raser etc..

Voila donc un film d’apparence innocente mais toujours des petites indications francs maçonnique dans pratiquement chaque film.

Sauf qu’on ne fait jamais attention a ces petits détails, mais entre eux ils arrivent a se reconnaître et manifester leur pouvoir de cette manière.

Il se pourrait que même les acteurs ne savent pas, ils suivent le scenario, le dialogue qui leur a été présenté, ils appliquent sans même savoir a quoi ils contribuent, possible que le directeur s’assure que tout est inclus dans le film et qu’aucun détail n’est laissé au hasard.

Parce que nous sommes très souvent distraits avec l’histoire du film, avec la musique, avec le paysage ou le rire et parce que on est totalement impliqués dans le film, on sombres dans l’ inconscient une sorte de transe, et par conséquent  on ne fait pas très attention aux  petits détails, cependant notre subconscient enregistre le tout et c’est ainsi que les masses sont éduquées et elles sont ramenées à accepter beaucoup de choses.